If it weren’t so pathetic it would almost be funny: Moody’s fuck-up supreme: They somehow kinda sorta assigned AAA ratings to a bunch of CPDOs that should have been rated far lower. They’re conducting “a thorough review” to see if a computer error was the culprit. The kicker is that some senior Moody’s staffers knew about the screw up since 2007 but kinda neglected to pass that info on. We’ve pretty much always never had much use for the rating agencies, since they were always so far behind the curve. Now we even have less use for them. Bring on the lawyers…
Some senior staff at Moody’s were aware in
early 2007 that constant proportion debt obligations, funds that used borrowed
money to bet on credit-default swaps, should have been ranked four levels lower,
the Financial Times said, citing internal Moody’s documents. Moody’s altered
some assumptions to avoid having to assign lower grades after it corrected the
error, the paper said.
The allegations raise questions about
internal controls at credit ratings firms as they face scrutiny from lawmakers
and regulators for assigning their top grades to securities derived from loans
to people with poor credit. U.S. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher
Dodd has flagged the potential conflict of interest between ratings firms and
the banks that pay their fees, while the Securities and Exchange Commission is
probing the way ratings are assigned.
“If it is true, does that mean other
products haven’t been rated correctly?” said Puneet Sharma, Barclays Capital’s
head of investment-grade credit strategy in London. “Will they be downgraded?
It could lead to turmoil.”
“The integrity of our ratings and rating
methodologies is extremely important to us, and we take seriously the questions
raised about European CPDOs,” New York-based Moody’s said in an e-mailed
statement. “We are therefore conducting a thorough review of this matter.”.
Uh-huh.
Moody’s Begins Probe on Report Bug Caused Aaa Grades – Bloomberg
Tags: Ratings