SEC whistleblower Gary Aguirre takes the Wall Street Journal to task in that paper for their criticism of him, proclaiming his charges against the SEC are justified. From the WSJ:
Over three weeks, your paper published a column and an editorial portraying me as a former SEC attorney who makes groundless charges against the Wall Street elite and SEC officials.
The column attacks one of two Pulitzer-prize winning reporters who co-authored the first New York Times article about the SEC’s Pequot investigation. You accuse the Times and the reporter of "airing allegations that [Morgan Stanley CEO John] Mack … helped a hedge fund engage in insider trading." You toss in that I "brainstormed up the Mack allegations." Your editorial also accuses me of making groundless allegations, but now against Mr. Mack and the SEC….
…it is not my practice to make empty allegations. Former Enforcement Director Steven Cutler made this point when the SEC hired me as a "superior qualifications appointment." He cited my track record: "substantial recoveries" in more than 90 "consecutive complex cases."
Equally mystifying is your reference to my "long held sweeping grievances against hedge funds." Before the Pequot investigation, I had no experience with hedge funds — good or bad, never invested in one, never knew anyone who did. Before the Pequot assignment, it is unlikely that I used the term more than 20 times in my life.
Finally, you proclaim your own credibility in coming to the rescue of the SEC: "We have no affection for the SEC." That is surely true. But how often would you come to the rescue of an SEC that treated the Wall Street elite just like everybody else, as required by law?
My Charges Against SEC Are Justified – Wall Street Journal
Tags: Gary Aguirre, John Mack, Morgan Stanley, Pequot Capital